Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02087
Original file (BC 2013 02087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02087

XXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Mar 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The composite FA score he received was given unfairly due to the walk portion of the FA, specifically the standards increasing as age increases and standards should decrease as age increases.  

He is a 48 year old male and scored 73.11 unsatisfactory FA, and states that using the exact same information in the official online calculator as a 40 year old male would generate a passing score of 81.44.

He argues that the walk FA test is age bias and not a fair assessment based on AF ‘Alternate Aerobic Component Walk Test Age Factor’ 
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Guard Reserve (AGR) in the grade of lieutenant colonel (05).

On 27 Mar 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 73.11 unsatisfactory.  He was exempt from the sit-up component.

IAW AFI 36-2905 (AFGM5) (dated 3 Jan 13), Para A 15.4.2, Calculate member's score (estimated V02 max) using the following formula which incorporates body weight (lb), age (yr), gender (males = I, females = 0), time to complete one mile (min), and post exercise heart rate (bpm): Estimated V02 max (ml/kg/min) = 132.853 - 0.0769(Weight) - 0.3877(Age) + 6.315(Gender) -
3.2649(Time)- 0.1565(HR)." This formula drives the calculations for walk test scoring.

The V02 in the calculation is 35.807808, when applied to the Alternate Aerobic Test Score Chart in AFI 36-2905, Atch 17, the resulting component score equals a component score of 42.3. Therefore, the AFFMS Fitness Calculator has in fact calculated applicant's score IAW AFI 36-2905. 

Information extracted from the AFFMS indicates the applicant failed to complete the cardio component of the contested FA.

The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
17 Apr 13
93.56 
Excellent 
*27 Mar 13
73.11
Unsatisfactory
05 Sep 12
88.00
Satisfactory
01 Mar 12
81.67
Satisfactory
29 Aug 11
78.11
Satisfactory

* Contested FA

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas:  Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute each).  Military members receive a composite score on a 0 to 100 scale based on the following maximum component scores: 60 points for aerobic, 20 points for body composition, 10 points for push-ups and 10 points for sit-ups.  To determine individual composite fitness scores the Air Force uses age and gender specific fitness score charts.  An unsatisfactory is a composite score less than 75 and/or one or more component minimums are not met.

On 2 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “No evidence of impropriety, V02 calculations IAW AFI 36-2905.” 

_______________________________________________________________







AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request, since the AFFMS Fitness Calculator calculated his score in accordance with the governing AFI. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  In this respect, we note that the applicant’s score for the 1-mile walk test was calculated in accordance with AFI 36-2905.  Therefore, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.  Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his request.  
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02087 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Vice Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Apr 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Oct 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Dec 13.




                                   XXXXXXXX
                                   Chair	




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03483

    Original file (BC 2012 03483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03483 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 13 Jul 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). “Body composition (height, weight, and AC) must be the first component assessed in the FA.” While the weight is not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550

    Original file (BC 2013 01550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01465

    Original file (BC 2013 01465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01465 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 22 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01195

    Original file (BC 2013 01195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 Feb 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and received a composite score of 68.00 resulting in an unsatisfactory fitness score. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 23 Sep 2013 88.50 Satisfactory 28 Mar 2013 94.67 Excellent *22 Feb 2013 68.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Aug 2013 88.10 Satisfactory 02 Feb 2013 100.00 Excellent * Contested FA On 15 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01174

    Original file (BC 2013 01174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01174 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 14 July 2011, 02 Feb 2012, and 31 Mar 2012 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01299

    Original file (BC 2013 01299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 06 Oct 2011, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 71.00, unsatisfactory. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Apr 2013 72.00 Unsatisfactory *30 Nov 2012 60.22 Unsatisfactory 30 Mar 2012 90.33 Excellent 09 Nov 2011 83.67 Satisfactory *06 Oct 2011 71.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822

    Original file (BC 2013 00822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02264

    Original file (BC 2013 02264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 09 Oct 13 86.88 Satisfactory 14 Mar 13 85.30 Satisfactory 20 Sep 12 77.00 Satisfactory 20 Mar 12 84.40 Satisfactory *07 Dec 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 2 Jan 14 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence, specifically AF Form 422.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01944

    Original file (BC 2013 01944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The updated AFFMS record indicates applicant continued to achieve unsatisfactory scores due to a composite score of 69.5 on both contested FAs. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Nov 13 70.00 Unsatisfactory 29 May 13 81.5 Satisfactory 27 Jul 12 Exempt Exempt *30 May 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory *2 Mar 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board corrected the AFFMS records to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05648

    Original file (BC 2012 05648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute each). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force,...